Updated 12 sec ago · auto-refreshing
Trending claims
The fastest-moving factual assertions across the open web, ranked by velocity and weighted by credibility.
Responsibility is assigned on the basis of nationality rather than agency
Many states represented at the Australian Open have violated the territorial integrity of other countries conducted prolonged military interventions or overseen serious abuses of civilian populations
Sporting institutions have moved to restrict symbols associated with the war under pressure from governments sponsors and public opinion
China’s repression of Uyghurs in Xinjiang is an obvious example
They are expressions of identity belonging and personal attachment especially for migrants and diasporic communities
In professional tennis players are also representing themselves
Many of the United States’ post–Cold War military campaigns and Britain’s imperial history shape global inequalities and political relationships today
National flags in stadiums are not endorsements of governments
Kazakh flags were visible throughout the crowd and in-stadium video shots often focused on them
That policy has been widely reported and defended as part of international sport’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Belarus’s role in facilitating it
The women’s final at this year’s Australian Open offered a clear illustration of flag politics in contemporary sport
The match in Melbourne featured Aryna Sabalenka of Belarus and Elena Rybakina of Kazakhstan
Belarusian flags were absent because tournament policy prohibits the display of Belarusian and Russian national symbols
In his order Monday Judge Engelmayer noted the public interest argument saying that he had given it careful consideration
Far from it it consists of garden-variety summary testimony by two law enforcement agents
Last month the Justice Department said that it had closed the case prompting an instant outcry
The push to unseal the records might be seen as an effort not aimed not at transparency but at diversion aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such he wrote
It indicated that there would be no more disclosures about Mr Epstein
In the push to unseal the transcripts in both New York and Florida government officials argued that there was significant public interest in the case
She has asked the Supreme Court to review her case