Trending
CLM-780886E7
AI-extracted claim
“The Ninth Circuit panel wrote that there was significant evidence supporting the Trump administration’s position”
The New York Times
by Michael Gold, Minho Kim, Chris Cameron, Eric Schmitt, Vjosa Isai, Danny Hakim, Richard Fausset, Ann E. Marimow, Laurel Rosenhall, Michael Grynbaum, Ann Marimow, Teddy Rosenbluth, Sheryl Gay Stolberg, Patrick McGeehan, Charlie Savage, Ana Swanson, Tony Romm, Valerie Hopkins, Laura Chung, Motoko Rich, Tariq Panja, Heather Knight, Juliet Macur
View original article
Analyzed on 2026-09-29T04:41:40+00:00 · Last updated 2026-09-29
Unverified
(Unverified)
Plain language: Insufficient evidence was found to render a verdict.
Credibility score
out of 100
Based on 1 source
Low confidence
01
Original context
Show passage from source article
The Ninth Circuit panel wrote in an unsigned ruling that there was significant evidence supporting the Trump administration’s position — reasoning that Ms. Noem’s decision to terminate the programs may not be subject to judicial review, and that “the government can likely show that the administrative record adequately supports the secretary’s action.”
Extracted from: Lawmakers Review Unredacted Epstein Files , The New York Times
02
Evidence
1 support
0 contradict
0 context
This analysis is based on a single source. Confidence is low.
Bias distribution of supporting sources
1
← Left
Center
Right →
Mean bias -0.20
05
Community Takes
No Takes have been written on this claim yet. Sign in to write a Take.
06
Metadata
Claim ID
CLM-780886E7
Slug
the-ninth-circuit-panel-wrote-that-there-was-significant-evi-780886e7
Origin
nytimes.com
Captured
225 d ago
Velocity
0.0/hr
Bias
0.00
Politics
Law