AI-extracted claim
“Tech companies can pursue options that could keep these tools broadly available while limiting any company’s incentives to surveil, profile and manipulate its users.”
Analyzed on 2026-08-22T05:05:04+00:00 · Last updated 2026-08-22
Plain language: The weight of evidence confirms this claim.
Credibility score
out of 100
Based on 2 sources
Low confidence
Original context
Show passage from source article
Tech companies can pursue options that could keep these tools broadly available while limiting any company’s incentives to surveil, profile and manipulate its users.
Extracted from: Opinion | I Left My Job at OpenAI. Putting Ads on ChatGPT Was the Last Straw. , The New York Times
Evidence
“With A.I. companions, simple design changes could put user well-being above short-term profit. For starters, large language models should stop acting like humans and exhibiting anthropomorphic cues that intentionally make bots seem alive. Chatbots can execute tasks without using the word “I,” sending emojis or claiming to have feelings. Models should pitch offramps to humans during tender moments — “maybe you should call your mom” — not upgrades to premium tiers. And they should allow conversations to naturally end instead of pestering users with follow-up questions and resisting goodbyes to fuel marathon sessions. In the long run, these features will be better for business: If A.I. companions weren’t engineered to be so addictive, developers and users alike would feel less need to resist.”
Opinion | We’re All in a Throuple With A.I.
Bias distribution of supporting sources
Mean bias -0.20
Community Takes
No Takes have been written on this claim yet. Sign in to write a Take.