Trending
CLM-D5A5FB79
AI-extracted claim
“Supreme Court determined to interpret Constitution provisions by looking to founding time and original public meaning”
Analyzed on 2026-09-18T01:43:45+00:00 · Last updated 2026-09-18
Unverified
(Unverified)
Plain language: Insufficient evidence was found to render a verdict.
Credibility score
out of 100
Based on 1 source
Low confidence
01
Original context
Show passage from source article
During Justice Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing in 2022, she told the senators, “The Supreme Court now very clearly has determined that in order to interpret provisions of the Constitution, we look to the time of the founding, and we ascertain based on what the original public meaning of the words of the Constitution were at the time.”
Extracted from: Opinion | An Alternative to the Supreme Court’s Originalism , The New York Times
02
Evidence
1 support
0 contradict
0 context
This analysis is based on a single source. Confidence is low.
Bias distribution of supporting sources
1
← Left
Center
Right →
Mean bias -0.20
05
Community Takes
No Takes have been written on this claim yet. Sign in to write a Take.
06
Metadata
Claim ID
CLM-D5A5FB79
Slug
supreme-court-determined-to-interpret-constitution-provision-d5a5fb79
Origin
nytimes.com
Captured
210 d ago
Velocity
0.0/hr
Bias
0.00
Law
History