RealFakeLies
Trending CLM-F14F2AAE

AI-extracted claim

“Human hair was classified as raw or virgin”
by Claretta Bellamy View original article

Analyzed on 2026-09-18T17:43:08+00:00 · Last updated 2026-09-18

Unverified (Unverified)

Plain language: Insufficient evidence was found to render a verdict.

Credibility score

out of 100

Based on 1 source

Low confidence

01

Original context

Show passage from source article
Human hair was classified as raw (unprocessed) or virgin (minimally processed); several types of synthetic hair were included, as well as blended synthetic and human hair, referred to as mastermix.

Extracted from: Harmful chemicals lurk in extensions and braiding hair marketed to Black women, study finds ,

02

Evidence

1 support 0 contradict 0 context

This analysis is based on a single source. Confidence is low.

nbcnews.com credibility 0.50 Supports

“Human hair was classified as raw (unprocessed) or virgin (minimally processed); several types of synthetic hair were included, as well as blended synthetic and human hair, referred to as mastermix.”

Harmful chemicals lurk in extensions and braiding hair marketed to Black women, study finds

Bias distribution of supporting sources

← Left Center Right →

Mean bias 0.00

05

Community Takes

No Takes have been written on this claim yet. Sign in to write a Take.

06

Metadata

Claim ID CLM-F14F2AAE
Slug human-hair-was-classified-as-raw-or-virgin-f14f2aae
Origin
Captured 215 d ago
Velocity 0.0/hr
Bias 0.00
Health