AI-extracted claim
“Courts should be restrained from doing the wrong thing but they should be active in doing the right thing.”
Analyzed on 2026-09-26T17:42:19+00:00 · Last updated 2026-09-26
Plain language: Insufficient evidence was found to render a verdict.
Credibility score
out of 100
Based on 1 source
Low confidence
Original context
Show passage from source article
cf. Keith E. Whittington, Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present 1 (2019) (observing a contemporary trend in favor of the position that “[c]ourts should be restrained from doing the wrong thing, but they should be active in doing the right thing”).
Extracted from: Confusion and Clarity in the Case for Supreme Court Reform ,
Evidence
This analysis is based on a single source. Confidence is low.
Bias distribution of supporting sources
Mean bias 0.00
Community Takes
No Takes have been written on this claim yet. Sign in to write a Take.