Trending
CLM-D04413BD
AI-extracted claim
“Alternatives have not refuted originalism defense summed up by Senator Thom Tillis”
Analyzed on 2026-09-17T23:44:05+00:00 · Last updated 2026-09-17
Unverified
(Unverified)
Plain language: Insufficient evidence was found to render a verdict.
Credibility score
out of 100
Based on 1 source
Low confidence
01
Original context
Show passage from source article
And none have successfully refuted the defense of originalism that was aptly summed up by Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican, at the Jackson confirmation hearing: “In my opinion, a justice’s job is to interpret the text and words of the Constitution as written, and give them their original meaning.
Extracted from: Opinion | An Alternative to the Supreme Court’s Originalism , The New York Times
02
Evidence
1 support
0 contradict
0 context
This analysis is based on a single source. Confidence is low.
Bias distribution of supporting sources
1
← Left
Center
Right →
Mean bias -0.20
05
Community Takes
No Takes have been written on this claim yet. Sign in to write a Take.
06
Metadata
Claim ID
CLM-D04413BD
Slug
alternatives-have-not-refuted-originalism-defense-summed-up-d04413bd
Origin
nytimes.com
Captured
210 d ago
Velocity
0.0/hr
Bias
0.00
Law
Politics