RealFakeLies
Sign in Create account
Trending CLM-7BB60F43

AI-extracted claim

“Abbott stated that no unopened, distributed infant formulas, including from the homes of sickened infants, have ever tested positive for the bacteria in question.”
The New York Times by Caroline Hopkins Legaspi View original article

Analyzed on 2026-09-19T09:40:27+00:00 · Last updated 2026-09-19

Unverified (Unverified)

Plain language: Insufficient evidence was found to render a verdict.

Credibility score

out of 100

Based on 1 source

Low confidence

01

Original context

Show passage from source article
In a statement provided to The Times on Monday, the company, which did not admit liability or fault in the settlement, noted that “no unopened, distributed Abbott infant formulas have ever tested positive” for the bacteria that sickened the babies, including containers from the homes of the infants.

Extracted from: Abbott to Pay $385 Million to Settle Infant Formula Allegations , The New York Times

02

Evidence

1 support 0 contradict 0 context

This analysis is based on a single source. Confidence is low.

The New York Times nytimes.com credibility 0.85 Supports

“In a statement provided to The Times on Monday, the company, which did not admit liability or fault in the settlement, noted that “no unopened, distributed Abbott infant formulas have ever tested positive” for the bacteria that sickened the babies, including containers from the homes of the infants.”

Abbott to Pay $385 Million to Settle Infant Formula Allegations

Read source

Bias distribution of supporting sources

← Left Center Right →

Mean bias -0.20

05

Community Takes

No Takes have been written on this claim yet. Sign in to write a Take.

06

Metadata

Claim ID CLM-7BB60F43
Slug abbott-stated-that-no-unopened-distributed-infant-formulas-7bb60f43
Origin nytimes.com
Captured 1 d ago
Velocity 0.0/hr
Bias 0.00
Health Business Safety