Politics

Someone residing in the United States must follow the law announced by the government

We have moral duty to support any reasonably just legal regime

The Court must receive a minimum amount of buy-in from citizens in order to validly impose its law on them

Some decisions can be wrong not because of improper legal reasoning but because of despicable consequences

Moral legitimacy can support compliance with Court decisions

Decent human lives would be impossible without government and law

Government must provide rights of democratic participation for legal regime to be reasonably just

People can call on Court to change if Court fails to meet limits

Democrats have previously endorsed similar strategies to those employed by Senator McConnell

The Court has structural features that make it more likely to produce undemocratic outcomes

The Court reached consistently progressive results under Chief Justice Warren

Anticanon refers to select set of cases that were wrong the day decided

The Court can be trusted to uphold constitutional rights democratic principles and judicial norms in this country

The Court is a proven threat to fundamental rights

Late-1930s policies that President Roosevelt pursued were part of second phase of New Deal that moved from immediate experimental attempts at relief to more pragmatic less experimental reform and regulation programs

Individuals who had high support for New Deal policies were more likely to support Court-packing

Public support began to rebound once Court retreated on those issues

Manifesto declared Brown v Board of Education represented Supreme Court substituting naked power for established law

Some people are angry because current Court is product of improper maneuvering by actors in elected branches

Supreme Court repeatedly invoked Constitution to constrain President Roosevelt's implementation of landmark planks of his platform